FansAgent

For 18+ creators · You stay in control

OnlyMonster vs Infloww pricing and features compared for OnlyFans agencies picking a CRM

People who search OnlyMonster vs Infloww are almost always agency owners. They run several OnlyFans pages, they pay a team of chatters, and they want to know which CRM costs less and keeps their accounts safer. Both are serious products. The answer depends on roster size, platforms, and how much you trust the vendor with your fan data.

Fan Studio

Today

$

First, pick your voice

The agent drafts every reply to sound exactly like you.

You set the voice, the offers, and the limits. You stay in control.

Fan of handled · earned

Agent read

drafting in your voice…
The agent is writing the reply…

Inbox handled. earned.

fans answered in your voice, every offer timed, and you never lifted a finger after picking the voice.

replied

earned

0

missed

18+ · You approve every message. The agent works in your voice, never instead of you.

The short answer

OnlyMonster is cheaper than Infloww at every earnings level. On 6 October 2026 OnlyMonster charged 30 to 250 dollars per creator account a month by earnings, with proxies and its own browser included, while Infloww charged 40 to 500 dollars per profile by earnings. A page earning 8,000 dollars costs 50 on OnlyMonster and 125 on Infloww. Infloww has the deeper chatter, vault and audit tools. Neither answers fans by itself: both AI features suggest replies a chatter sends. FansAgent answers fans in each creator's voice on OnlyFans, Fansly and Fanvue for a flat 49, 149 or 399 dollars.

Agency manager comparing two CRM dashboards on two laptops late at night
Most agencies compare the two on the fee per page. Run the numbers on your whole roster, the gap compounds.
Night shift chat team at desks in an agency office with one empty seat
Both CRMs assume a chatter presses send. On most rosters that payroll is bigger than either software bill.

We read both vendors at source on 6 October 2026: onlymonster.ai/pricing and its homepage, and infloww.com/pricing alongside Infloww's help center. OnlyMonster sells one app that combines the CRM with its own browser, where each account runs in an isolated session with its own proxy, so an agency does not need a separate anti-detect browser. It adds role based access, shift scheduling, activity reporting per account and per team member, tracking links, AI assisted message suggestions with the option to bring your own model, and a public API with webhooks. Infloww is built around Messages Pro, Smart Lists, Smart Messages and Vault Pro, with roles, shift creation and scheduling, sales per chatter, revenue and profit per tracking link, and a dedicated proxy per creator.

Price is where OnlyMonster wins clearly. Both bill per creator account and both climb with that creator's last 30 days of earnings. OnlyMonster runs seven plans from 30 dollars for a page earning under 2,500 dollars to 250 dollars over 50,000, with 3 and 6 month discounts, and primary proxies are included in every plan. Infloww runs twelve brackets from 40 dollars under 500 dollars of earnings to 500 dollars over 75,000. At 8,000 dollars a month a page costs 50 dollars on OnlyMonster and 125 on Infloww. At 25,000 it is 150 against 225. On a ten page roster of 25,000 dollar pages that is 1,500 a month against 2,250, every month.

The AI is closer than the marketing suggests. Neither tool answers fans by itself. OnlyMonster offers AI suggestions inside the inbox and an AI gateway for plugging in your own model through an API key. Infloww AI Copilot, labelled beta in every help article, gives a chatter three suggested replies in one of four styles, and each generated prompt costs one credit, 1 cent, whether it is sent or not. In both cases a person on your payroll still reads the suggestion and presses send. So the biggest line on either bill is not the CRM. It is the chat team.

There is also a legal question buyers keep asking about. In Infinni Innovations SA v OFMS Ltd and others, [2026] EWHC 470 (Comm), the company behind Infloww sued the companies and individuals behind OnlyMonster in the High Court in London, alleging that data such as fan notes and scripts was taken from Infloww's servers between December 2024 and November 2025. In March 2026 the judge kept an interim injunction in place in a narrowed form, pending a full trial. Agencies already using OnlyMonster were allowed to keep accessing the fan notes and scripts involved, and other use of that data by the defendants stayed prohibited. OnlyMonster's press page says the order lets agencies and creators keep using its platform. The allegations have not been tried, and we take no side. For a buyer, the practical point is simple: export your own fan notes and scripts regularly, whichever CRM you use.

Platforms narrow the choice. Infloww lists OnlyFans, Fansly, Fanvue and MYM plans, but AI Copilot appears on the OnlyFans plan only. OnlyMonster's documentation covers Fansly in the inbox and Fanvue for team operations. If part of your roster is on Fansly, check how each tool handles that page before you move it, because Fansly's terms, updated 21 July 2026, bar AI that interacts with fans without human oversight.

FansAgent is the third option for the agency whose real cost is the chat team. Instead of suggesting replies to a chatter, the agent trains on each creator's past messages and answers every fan in that voice, lines up PPV and tips inside the price bands the creator sets, and routes the fan tiers you choose, such as top spenders and customs, through approval before anything sends. Starter is 49 dollars for one page, Pro is 149 with the fan CRM, and Studio is 399 for up to ten pages with team seats and roles, on OnlyFans, Fansly and Fanvue.

Where each still wins: OnlyMonster for an agency that wants the cheapest CRM with the browser and proxies built in, and an open API. Infloww for a large chat team that wants the deepest chatter tools, the vault and audit trail, and a vendor that is not a defendant in a data case. FansAgent when you want fewer people in the inbox, because it does not run payroll or shift scheduling, but it does send the replies.

What it does for you

OnlyMonster vs Infloww, the way it should work

Replies that send themselves

OnlyMonster and Infloww both suggest replies for a chatter to send. FansAgent answers the fan itself in the creator's trained voice, with approval on any tier you pick.

One flat fee for ten pages

Both CRMs charge per page and climb with earnings. FansAgent Studio covers up to ten pages for 399 dollars a month, however much they earn.

Fansly and Fanvue too

Infloww's Copilot sits on the OnlyFans plan only. FansAgent answers on OnlyFans, Fansly and Fanvue from one dashboard, with approval mode for Fansly pages.

What you get

  • Cut chatter shifts with AI that answers in each creator's voice
  • Keep approval on for whales, customs and Fansly pages
  • Sell PPV and tips inside the price bands you set
  • Pay one flat fee that does not climb with earnings

Your inbox, handled.

Pick your voice, see the agent draft an on-brand reply and a tasteful upsell, and watch the revenue land. Quick to set up, you stay in control.

Price by bracket

OnlyMonster vs Infloww cost per page at three earnings levels

OnlyMonster plan fees read from onlymonster.ai/pricing on 6 October 2026 (monthly billing, before the 3 and 6 month discounts). Infloww bracket fees read from the earnings selector on infloww.com/pricing on 17 September 2026; the page still leads with 40 dollars and ties the fee to creator earnings. Both vendors price on the creator's last 30 days of earnings.

OnlyMonster vs Infloww cost per page at three earnings levels
Page earns a month OnlyMonster Infloww FansAgent
3,000 dollars 40 dollars plus chatter pay 70 dollars plus Copilot credits plus chatter pay 49 dollars on Starter, 149 on Pro
8,000 dollars 50 dollars plus chatter pay 125 dollars plus credits plus chatter pay 149 dollars
25,000 dollars 150 dollars plus chatter pay 225 dollars plus credits plus chatter pay 149 dollars
Ten pages at 25,000 dollars 1,500 dollars plus chatter pay 2,250 dollars plus credits plus chatter pay 399 dollars on Studio

Chatter pay is the open line in both CRM columns and usually the largest one. An hourly chatting service such as ChatterService lists 5 dollars an hour plus 3 percent of sales, so round the clock cover on a single page runs about 3,600 dollars a month before commission.

Side by side

OnlyMonster vs Infloww vs FansAgent, line by line

Read at source on 6 October 2026: onlymonster.ai/pricing and homepage, docs.onlymonster.ai, infloww.com/pricing and homepage, and the help.infloww.com AI Copilot articles. Court details from the published judgment [2026] EWHC 470 (Comm). Where a vendor is the better fit, the table says so.

OnlyMonster vs Infloww vs FansAgent, line by line
What matters OnlyMonster Infloww FansAgent
Price model Per account, 30 to 250 dollars by earnings in 7 plans. 3 and 6 month discounts Per profile, 40 to 500 dollars by earnings in 12 brackets. Copilot credits at 1 cent Flat 49, 149 or 399 dollars a month. No commission
Who sends the reply A chatter. AI suggests replies, or bring your own model A chatter. AI Copilot (beta) suggests three replies to edit and send The agent, in each creator's voice, with approval per fan tier
Account safety Own browser, isolated session and proxy per account, included Dedicated proxy per creator, sensitive word blocker Approval mode and per tier rules. Not a browser or proxy tool
Team tools Roles, shift scheduling, activity per account and team member, tracking links Roles, shifts, sales per chatter, Vault Pro, profit per tracking link Team seats and roles on Studio. No payroll or shift scheduling
Developer access Public API and webhooks, no separate fee API listed as beta, no public docs when we checked Not the focus
Platforms OnlyFans, with Fansly inbox and Fanvue team support in the docs OnlyFans, Fansly, Fanvue and MYM. Copilot on OnlyFans only OnlyFans, Fansly and Fanvue
Legal background Defendant side in Infinni Innovations v OFMS, trial pending Claimant side in the same case Not involved
Best fit Cost conscious agencies that want the browser and proxies in one bill Large chat teams that want the deepest chatter tools and vault Agencies that want AI to take over the inbox at a fixed price

FansAgent is not affiliated with OnlyMonster or Infloww. Names are used only to compare published features and prices, and both vendors reprice, so confirm on their own pages before you buy.

Good to know

Questions agencies ask when choosing between OnlyMonster and Infloww

OnlyMonster is better on price and on account safety tooling, because its own browser and a proxy per account are included and it costs less at every earnings level. Infloww is better for a big chat team that needs the deepest chatter reporting, the vault and an audit trail. If you want replies sent without a chatter, FansAgent is a flat 49 to 399 dollars.
OnlyMonster bills per creator account by the last 30 days of earnings. On 6 October 2026 the monthly plans were 30, 40, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 dollars, from under 2,500 dollars of earnings to over 50,000, with discounts on 3 and 6 month billing. Primary proxies are included in every plan.
Infloww charges per creator profile, and the fee rises with what that creator earns. The pricing page leads with 40 dollars, and its earnings selector ran from 40 dollars under 500 dollars of earnings to 500 dollars over 75,000. A page earning 8,000 dollars pays 125. AI Copilot credits are extra, at 1 cent each.
Yes, at every earnings level we checked. A page earning 3,000 dollars costs 40 on OnlyMonster and 70 on Infloww, at 8,000 it is 50 against 125, and at 25,000 it is 150 against 225. On ten pages at 25,000 dollars the gap is 750 dollars a month before chatter pay.
Infinni Innovations, the company behind Infloww, sued the companies and people behind OnlyMonster in the High Court in London, alleging fan notes and scripts were taken from its servers. In March 2026 the judge kept a narrowed interim injunction pending trial. Agencies already on OnlyMonster may keep accessing that data. Nothing has been decided at trial.
Yes. The March 2026 ruling narrowed the injunction so agencies already using OnlyMonster could keep accessing the fan notes and scripts involved, and OnlyMonster says the order lets agencies and creators keep using its platform. The case is still heading to trial, so keep your own export of fan notes and scripts whichever CRM you use.
Not one that answers fans by itself. OnlyMonster offers AI suggestions in the inbox and lets you plug in your own model by API key. Infloww AI Copilot, still labelled beta, suggests three replies and a chatter edits and sends one. FansAgent answers fans on its own in each creator's voice, with approval on the tiers you choose.
Its documentation covers Fansly in the inbox and Fanvue for team operations, while its pricing is built around OnlyFans earnings. Infloww has separate Fansly, Fanvue and MYM plans, but Copilot is listed on the OnlyFans plan only. FansAgent answers on OnlyFans, Fansly and Fanvue, with approval mode for Fansly pages.
Export your fan notes, scripts and chatter reports from Infloww first, then move one page and run both for a week to compare sales and response times. Cancel Infloww only after the roster is live elsewhere. If the goal is fewer chatter hours rather than a cheaper CRM, test an AI that sends, such as FansAgent, on the same page.
For two to five pages under 10,000 dollars each, OnlyMonster usually costs about half of Infloww and includes proxies. Infloww starts to justify its fee when you manage a large chat team. If you do not want to hire chatters at all, FansAgent Studio covers up to ten pages for 399 dollars and answers the fans itself.
Sticker prices in this category are close to meaningless because every vendor charges for a different unit, and all three change the unit price with earnings. The only way to compare them is to price the same roster on all three. Take six creators earning $400, $2,000, $6,000, $8,000, $12,000 and $18,000 a month.
They solve the same problem, and since both bill by earnings, the choice no longer comes down to flat versus variable. Infloww is the better product for most established agencies: it is faster, the message export is better, it covers Fansly, Fanvue and MYM with a full inbox where OnlyMonster offers a Fansly inbox and only basic team tools on Fanvue, and it is the only one of the three with a public status page. OnlyMonster is cheaper at every single earnings bracket. A creator earning $3,000 is $70 on Infloww against $40 on OnlyMonster, a creator at $12,000 is $175 against $100, and a creator at $40,000 is $275 against $200. On a roster of established earners that gap is the price of Infloww's stability and reach, and whether it is worth paying depends on how much a bad afternoon in the dashboard costs you.
The CRM is, for small pages: free if you are under ten accounts and can live with the Lite feature set, and $15 an account on Premium while the account earns under $1,000 a month, among the lowest published paid rates in the category. It is not the budget option it looks like on a working roster. From $1,000 a month an account costs $69, which is more than OnlyMonster's $30 to $50 up to $10,000, level with Infloww's $65 to $70 up to $5,000 and well under Infloww above that. The six-creator roster above costs $440 on CRM Premium against $360 on OnlyMonster.

Get started

OnlyMonster is the cheaper CRM with the browser built in. Infloww has the deeper chatter tools. Neither one answers fans for you. FansAgent does, on a flat fee. Try the studio above and see for yourself.

For 18+ creators · You stay in control · You approve, it works.